Subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD)
![Fig 94 SQICD](https://www.theheart.ae/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Fig-94-SQICD.webp)
![risk 1](https://www.theheart.ae/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/risk-1.gif)
Lower risk of lead-related complications
Since the S-ICD does not require leads to be placed inside the heart, the risk of lead-related complications such as lead fracture, lead dislodgement, and infection is reduced.
![heart 1](https://www.theheart.ae/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/heart-1.gif)
Easier to implant
S-ICDs are generally easier and quicker to implant than traditional ICDs since they do not require the placement of leads inside the heart.
![alms 1](https://www.theheart.ae/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/alms-1.gif)
Less invasive
S-ICDs are less invasive than traditional ICDs since they are implanted just under the skin of the chest.
![heart 1](https://www.theheart.ae/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/heart-1.gif)
Limited pacing capabilities
S-ICDs do not have the ability to provide pacing therapy, which may be necessary for some patients.
![opd 1](https://www.theheart.ae/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/opd-1.gif)
Limited programming options
S-ICDs have fewer programming options than traditional ICDs, which may limit the ability to fine-tune the device for optimal performance.
![alms 1](https://www.theheart.ae/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/alms-1.gif)
Higher cost
S-ICDs are generally more expensive than traditional ICDs.
![fever 1](https://www.theheart.ae/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/fever-1.gif)
Limited battery life
S-ICDs have a limited battery life compared to traditional ICDs, which may more frequent battery replacement.
![heart 1](https://www.theheart.ae/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/heart-1.gif)
Larger size
The S-ICD has a larger size battery compared to a traditional ICD since it has to deliver the shock from a distance further away from the heart